summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>2011-02-26 06:23:23 +0000
committerFelix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>2011-02-26 06:23:23 +0000
commit89a668b52a7df45e2dfdb02014dc4c30a8f996ef (patch)
treebe66fc0b8bafc2a1b9e0bda0271d74adea35f4cb
parent13556da59a1bc11afb4eac2fcc14b81acfe0c103 (diff)
downloadmtk-20170518-89a668b52a7df45e2dfdb02014dc4c30a8f996ef.zip
mtk-20170518-89a668b52a7df45e2dfdb02014dc4c30a8f996ef.tar.gz
mtk-20170518-89a668b52a7df45e2dfdb02014dc4c30a8f996ef.tar.bz2
ixp4xx: fix the i2c pld driver for 2.6.37 - i2c uses a rt_mutex instead of a mutex now
SVN-Revision: 25725
-rw-r--r--target/linux/ixp4xx/patches-2.6.37/020-gateworks_i2c_pld.patch26
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/ixp4xx/patches-2.6.37/020-gateworks_i2c_pld.patch b/target/linux/ixp4xx/patches-2.6.37/020-gateworks_i2c_pld.patch
index 6c93c44..c4904b7 100644
--- a/target/linux/ixp4xx/patches-2.6.37/020-gateworks_i2c_pld.patch
+++ b/target/linux/ixp4xx/patches-2.6.37/020-gateworks_i2c_pld.patch
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
+/*
+ * The Gateworks I2C PLD chip does not properly send the acknowledge bit
+ * thus we cannot use standard i2c_smbus functions. We have recreated
-+ * our own here, but we still use the mutex_lock to lock the i2c_bus
++ * our own here, but we still use the rt_mutex_lock to lock the i2c_bus
+ * as the device still exists on the I2C bus.
+*/
+
@@ -179,21 +179,21 @@
+ int ret;
+ struct gw_i2c_pld *gpio = container_of(chip, struct gw_i2c_pld, chip);
+ struct i2c_adapter *adap = gpio->client->adapter;
-+
++
+ if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) {
-+ ret = mutex_trylock(&adap->bus_lock);
++ ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&adap->bus_lock);
+ if (!ret)
+ /* I2C activity is ongoing. */
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ } else {
-+ mutex_lock_nested(&adap->bus_lock, adap->level);
++ rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock);
+ }
+
+ gpio->out |= (1 << offset);
+
+ ret = i2c_pld_write_byte(gpio->client->addr, gpio->out);
+
-+ mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
++ rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
@@ -204,19 +204,19 @@
+ s32 value;
+ struct gw_i2c_pld *gpio = container_of(chip, struct gw_i2c_pld, chip);
+ struct i2c_adapter *adap = gpio->client->adapter;
-+
++
+ if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) {
-+ ret = mutex_trylock(&adap->bus_lock);
++ ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&adap->bus_lock);
+ if (!ret)
+ /* I2C activity is ongoing. */
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ } else {
-+ mutex_lock_nested(&adap->bus_lock, adap->level);
++ rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock);
+ }
+
+ value = i2c_pld_read_byte(gpio->client->addr);
+
-+ mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
++ rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
+
+ return (value < 0) ? 0 : (value & (1 << offset));
+}
@@ -229,14 +229,14 @@
+ struct i2c_adapter *adap = gpio->client->adapter;
+
+ unsigned bit = 1 << offset;
-+
++
+ if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) {
-+ ret = mutex_trylock(&adap->bus_lock);
++ ret = rt_mutex_trylock(&adap->bus_lock);
+ if (!ret)
+ /* I2C activity is ongoing. */
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ } else {
-+ mutex_lock_nested(&adap->bus_lock, adap->level);
++ rt_mutex_lock(&adap->bus_lock);
+ }
+
+
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
+
+ ret = i2c_pld_write_byte(gpio->client->addr, gpio->out);
+
-+ mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
++ rt_mutex_unlock(&adap->bus_lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}