madwifi: clean up wme handling, use same packet classification as mac80211

SVN-Revision: 16790

1 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/package/madwifi/patches/440-wme_cleanup.patch b/package/madwifi/patches/440-wme_cleanup.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d6c1b26
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/madwifi/patches/440-wme_cleanup.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+--- a/net80211/ieee80211_output.c
++++ b/net80211/ieee80211_output.c
+@@ -73,6 +73,29 @@ doprint(struct ieee80211vap *vap, int su
+ }
+ #endif
+ 
++static const int ieee802_1d_to_ac[8] = {
++	WME_AC_BE, WME_AC_BK, WME_AC_BK, WME_AC_BE,
++	WME_AC_VI, WME_AC_VI, WME_AC_VO, WME_AC_VO
++};
++
++/* Given a data frame determine the 802.1p/1d tag to use. */
++static unsigned int ieee80211_classify_ip(struct sk_buff *skb)
++{
++	const struct ether_header *eh = (struct ether_header *) skb->data;
++	const struct iphdr *ip = (struct iphdr *)
++			(skb->data + sizeof (struct ether_header));
++	unsigned int dscp;
++
++	switch (skb->protocol) {
++	case __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP):
++		dscp = ip->tos & 0xfc;
++		break;
++	default:
++		return 0;
++	}
++
++	return dscp >> 5;
++}
+ 
+ /*
+  * Determine the priority based on VLAN and/or IP TOS. Priority is
+@@ -83,90 +106,24 @@ static int
+ ieee80211_classify(struct ieee80211_node *ni, struct sk_buff *skb)
+ {
+ 	struct ieee80211vap *vap = ni->ni_vap;
+-	struct ether_header *eh = (struct ether_header *) skb->data;
+-	int v_wme_ac = 0, d_wme_ac = 0;
+-
+-	/* default priority */
+-	skb->priority = WME_AC_BE;
+-
+-	if (!(ni->ni_flags & IEEE80211_NODE_QOS))
+-		return 0;
+ 
+-	/* 
+-	 * If node has a vlan tag then all traffic
+-	 * to it must have a matching vlan id.
++	/* skb->priority values from 256->263 are magic values to
++	 * directly indicate a specific 802.1d priority.  This is used
++	 * to allow 802.1d priority to be passed directly in from VLAN
++	 * tags, etc.
+ 	 */
+-	if (ni->ni_vlan != 0 && vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
+-		u_int32_t tag=0;
+-		int v_pri;
+-
+-		if (vap->iv_vlgrp == NULL) {
+-			IEEE80211_NODE_STAT(ni, tx_novlantag);
+-			ni->ni_stats.ns_tx_novlantag++;
+-			return 1;
+-		}
+-		if (((tag = vlan_tx_tag_get(skb)) & VLAN_VID_MASK) !=
+-		    (ni->ni_vlan & VLAN_VID_MASK)) {
+-			IEEE80211_NODE_STAT(ni, tx_vlanmismatch);
+-			ni->ni_stats.ns_tx_vlanmismatch++;
+-			return 1;
+-		}
+-		if (ni->ni_flags & IEEE80211_NODE_QOS) {
+-			v_pri = (tag >> VLAN_PRI_SHIFT) & VLAN_PRI_MASK;
+-			switch (v_pri) {
+-			case 1:
+-			case 2:		/* Background (BK) */
+-				v_wme_ac = WME_AC_BK;
+-				break;
+-			case 0:
+-			case 3:		/* Best Effort (BE) */
+-				v_wme_ac = WME_AC_BE;
+-				break;
+-			case 4:
+-			case 5:		/* Video (VI) */
+-				v_wme_ac = WME_AC_VI;
+-				break;
+-			case 6:
+-			case 7:		/* Voice (VO) */
+-				v_wme_ac = WME_AC_VO;
+-				break;
+-			}
+-		}
++	if (skb->priority >= 256 && skb->priority <= 263) {
++		skb->priority = ieee802_1d_to_ac[skb->priority - 256];
++		return 0;
+ 	}
+ 
+-	if (eh->ether_type == __constant_htons(ETHERTYPE_IP)) {
+-		const struct iphdr *ip = (struct iphdr *)
+-			(skb->data + sizeof (struct ether_header));
+-		/*
+-		 * IP frame, map the TOS field.
+-		 *
+-		 * XXX: fill out these mappings???
+-		 */
+-		switch (ip->tos) {
+-		case 0x08:				/* Background */
+-		case 0x20:
+-			d_wme_ac = WME_AC_BK;
+-			break;
+-		case 0x28:				/* Video */
+-		case 0xa0:
+-			d_wme_ac = WME_AC_VI;
+-			break;
+-		case 0x30:				/* Voice */
+-		case 0xe0:
+-		case 0x88:				/* XXX UPSD */
+-		case 0xb8:
+-			d_wme_ac = WME_AC_VO;
+-			break;
+-		default:				/* All others */
+-			d_wme_ac = WME_AC_BE;
+-			break;
+-		}
+-	} else {
+-		d_wme_ac = WME_AC_BE;
++	if (!(ni->ni_flags & IEEE80211_NODE_QOS)) {
++		/* default priority */
++		skb->priority = WME_AC_BE;
++		return 0;
+ 	}
+-	skb->priority = d_wme_ac;
+-	if (v_wme_ac > d_wme_ac)
+-		skb->priority = v_wme_ac;
++
++	skb->priority = ieee802_1d_to_ac[ieee80211_classify_ip(skb)];
+ 
+ 	/* Applying ACM policy */
+ 	if (vap->iv_opmode == IEEE80211_M_STA) {