ramips: use consistent naming scheme for LEDs

The upstream LED naming convention is "device:color:led-name", but it seems that many of supported boards in OpenWrt don't follow this approach.
The following patch fixes this inconsistency in dts{,i} files and updates base-files scripts for ramips target:
 * fixes wrong indentation
 * keeps case statements structure in same convention as in other scripts (no empty line after ";;", no indentation for case...esac body)
 * fixes wrong LED names for some of boards (makes them the same as in dts{,i} files)
 * combines boards with same configuration (ex. set_wifi_led "rt2800pci-phy0::radio" in 01_leds)

Signed-off-by: Piotr Dymacz <pepe2k@gmail.com>

SVN-Revision: 46664

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/RT-N14U.dts b/target/linux/ramips/dts/RT-N14U.dts
index cd46bdf..6d1080b 100644
--- a/target/linux/ramips/dts/RT-N14U.dts
+++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/RT-N14U.dts
@@ -83,27 +83,27 @@
 		compatible = "gpio-leds";
 
 		wan {
-			label = "asus:blue:wan";
+			label = "rt-n14u:blue:wan";
 			gpios = <&gpio2 0 1>;
 		};
 
 		lan {
-			label = "asus:blue:lan";
+			label = "rt-n14u:blue:lan";
 			gpios = <&gpio2 1 1>;
 		};
 
 		usb {
-			label = "asus:blue:usb";
+			label = "rt-n14u:blue:usb";
 			gpios = <&gpio2 2 1>;
 		};
 
 		power {
-			label = "asus:blue:power";
+			label = "rt-n14u:blue:power";
 			gpios = <&gpio2 3 1>;
 		};
 
 		air {
-			label = "asus:blue:air";
+			label = "rt-n14u:blue:air";
 			gpios = <&gpio3 0 1>;
 		};
 	};