1 files changed, 0 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-4.4/001-4.15-10-bcm63xx_enet-do-not-rely-on-probe-order.patch b/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-4.4/001-4.15-10-bcm63xx_enet-do-not-rely-on-probe-order.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index b14dedc..0000000
--- a/target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-4.4/001-4.15-10-bcm63xx_enet-do-not-rely-on-probe-order.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-From 71710bb6cbc82f411a4e5faafa0c3178e48e7137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:31:45 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH 3/6] bcm63xx_enet: do not rely on probe order
-
-Do not rely on the shared device being probed before the enet(sw)
-devices. This makes it easier to eventually move out the shared
-device as a dma controller driver (what it should be).
-
-Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
----
- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.c | 9 ++-------
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
-
---- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.c
-+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcm63xx_enet.c
-@@ -1736,10 +1736,8 @@ static int bcm_enet_probe(struct platfor
- 	const char *clk_name;
- 	int i, ret;
- 
--	/* stop if shared driver failed, assume driver->probe will be
--	 * called in the same order we register devices (correct ?) */
- 	if (!bcm_enet_shared_base[0])
--		return -ENODEV;
-+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
- 
- 	res_irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
- 	res_irq_rx = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 1);
-@@ -2720,11 +2718,8 @@ static int bcm_enetsw_probe(struct platf
- 	struct resource *res_mem;
- 	int ret, irq_rx, irq_tx;
- 
--	/* stop if shared driver failed, assume driver->probe will be
--	 * called in the same order we register devices (correct ?)
--	 */
- 	if (!bcm_enet_shared_base[0])
--		return -ENODEV;
-+		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
- 
- 	res_mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
- 	irq_rx = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);