summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/toolchain/gdb/patches/790-debian_dwarf2-cfi-warning.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'toolchain/gdb/patches/790-debian_dwarf2-cfi-warning.patch')
-rw-r--r--toolchain/gdb/patches/790-debian_dwarf2-cfi-warning.patch39
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/toolchain/gdb/patches/790-debian_dwarf2-cfi-warning.patch b/toolchain/gdb/patches/790-debian_dwarf2-cfi-warning.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cfb3d95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/toolchain/gdb/patches/790-debian_dwarf2-cfi-warning.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+Status: Unsuitable for upstream (at least, without a lot of arguing).
+
+GCC does not specify the state of every last register in the CIE. Since
+GCC's focus is on correctness of runtime unwinding, any registers which
+have to be unwound will be specified; but unmodified registers will not
+be explicitly marked. (How about modified, call-clobbered registers?
+I'm not sure if they are marked as unavailable.)
+
+GDB issues a noisy warning about this. The warning is generally not useful,
+and we can get it extremely frequently (any time we load a new CIE).
+
+This patch disables the warning. Alternately we could set the complaints
+threshold to zero, or implement a default frame init-register method for
+every architecture. But someday the compiler will support using different
+calling conventions for internal functions, so that's not much of a stopgap.
+ARM has a complex algorithm for handling this, involving scanning all CIEs -
+benefit not completely clear outside of the ARM context of flexible register
+sets.
+
+Index: gdb-6.3/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c
+===================================================================
+--- gdb-6.3.orig/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c 2004-11-15 11:54:57.000000000 -0500
++++ gdb-6.3/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c 2004-12-08 18:02:23.896409471 -0500
+@@ -705,9 +705,12 @@ dwarf2_frame_cache (struct frame_info *n
+ table. We need a way of iterating through all the valid
+ DWARF2 register numbers. */
+ if (fs->regs.reg[column].how == DWARF2_FRAME_REG_UNSPECIFIED)
+- complaint (&symfile_complaints,
+- "Incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers at 0x%s",
+- paddr (fs->pc));
++ {
++ if (0)
++ complaint (&symfile_complaints,
++ "Incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers at 0x%s",
++ paddr (fs->pc));
++ }
+ else
+ cache->reg[regnum] = fs->regs.reg[column];
+ }